Blog

• Beyond Time-to-Market and Quality of Service: We're not used to think that way

  When mapping time-to-market and quality-of-service as independent dimensions, it becomes obvious that there is something lacking in our language, that is detrimental to the success of any transition to agility. What do we really need to get past the bi-modal model of IT?

  Posted Jul 21, 10:59 pm, Author Dana Stoll

• From Morals to Ethics: Surviving the Current Backlash

  The Huffington Post today raised an interesting question about ethics, asking whether white supremacists should be able to practice law, or whether the profession should eliminate people “who aren’t morally fit”. I suggest that the problem is a deeper one, one that lies in the fine distinction between morals and ethics. We should have transcended moral-based judgments. Since the rise of the governance wave pretty much every professional organisation comes with a code of ethics. However, recently, a backlash emerged that put financial optimisation back on top of the agenda, along with moral-based evaluation.

  Posted Dec 25, 07:44 pm, Author Dana Stoll

• Science and Religion: A Quest for Respect

  Scriptures like the Bible or the Qur’an have little to offer for the atheist scientist. The atheist scientist has completely stopped to ask “Why?” questions and finds delight in investigating “How?” things work. He knows emergence, butterfly effects, how complexity may arise from almost nothing, and does not need transcendental explanations for human complexity or afterlife.

  However, what has science to offer to people who did not give up “Why?” questions?

  Posted Oct 11, 06:20 pm, Author Dana Stoll

• Freud's Unconscious in Brief

  Easy takeaway from this lecture of Jordan Peterson: Peterson claims that humans are not 100% rational, not everything is transparent to us. We do things that we don’t understand all the time. That … is the shortest precise definition of Freud’s “unconscious” I have heard yet.

  Posted Aug 18, 06:26 pm, Author Dana Stoll

• Human Gene Editing and Religious Concerns

  The Religions say that you shouldn’t interfere with creation or God’s will. But. Even if you go down that road, then whatever you do or decide is already contained in God’s will. It’s not people interfering with a creationg, it’s contingent intelligence expressing itself. This line of reason offers as little ethical discussion as does a purely Darwinist stance …

  Posted Jul 29, 01:21 pm, Author Dana Stoll

← Older Newer →